Is the military a "no means no" or a "yes means yes" jurisdiction? Is the absence of consent proved by expressed non-consent, or by the absence of affirmative consent?
2 Comments
Tami a/k/a Princess Leia
7/1/2024 13:40:04
I think we are still a "no means no" jurisdiction, so that non-consent, either verbalized or through conduct, must be affirmatively proven by the government. "Yes means yes," a/k/a "affirmative consent" is ridiculous, because what's being taught is that "yes doesn't always mean yes, it might mean no or maybe."
Reply
Tami a/k/a Princess Leia
7/1/2024 13:42:50
But then "no" doesn't always mean "no," because people are free to change their minds from "yes" to "no," as well as from "no" to "yes."
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Disclaimer: Posts are the authors' personal opinions and do not reflect the position of any organization or government agency.
Co-editors:
Phil Cave Brenner Fissell Links
SCOTUS CAAF -Daily Journal -2024 Ops ACCA AFCCA CGCCA NMCCA JRAP JRTP UCMJ Amendments to UCMJ Since 1950 (2024 ed.) Amendments to RCM Since 1984 (2024 ed.) Amendments to MRE Since 1984 (2024 ed.) MCM 2024 MCM 2023 MCM 2019 MCM 2016 MCM 2012 MCM 1995 UMCJ History Global Reform Army Lawyer JAG Reporter Army Crim. L. Deskbook J. App. Prac. & Pro. CAAFlog 1.0 CAAFlog 2.0 Archives
July 2024
Categories
All
|